No type of act is inherently wrong - not even murder - it depends on the result of the act. ![]() Results-based ethics produces this important conclusion for ethical thinking: So, for example, according to rule consequentialism we consider lying to be wrong because we know that in general lying produces bad consequences.Instead they use ethical rules that are derived from considering the general consequences of particular types of acts. ![]() In practice people don't assess the ethical consequences of every single act (that's called 'act consequentialism') because they don't have the time. Other forms of consequentialism take a more subtle approach for example stating that people should maximise the satisfaction of their fully informed and rational preferences.Hedonism states that people should maximise human pleasure.Utilitarianism states that people should maximise human welfare or well-being (which they used to call 'utility' - hence the name).People should live so as to maximise good consequencesÄifferent forms of consequentialism differ over what the good thing is that should be maximised.A person should choose the action that maximises good consequencesĪnd it gives this general guidance on how to live:. ![]() It gives us this guidance when faced with a moral dilemma:
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |